Even FootingArgue on the merits
← All guides

Protected acts & victimisation

5 min read · Reviewed 21 June 2026

Victimisation protects people who complain about discrimination — or help someone else who does — from being punished for it. This guide explains the two pieces: the protected act, and the detriment that follows.

What is a protected act?

A protected act is, broadly, doing one of these things: bringing discrimination proceedings; giving evidence or information in connection with them; making an allegation that someone has breached the Equality Act; or doing any other thing for the purposes of the Act. A grievance that complains of discrimination usually qualifies, even if it never uses the word 'discrimination', as long as it conveys that complaint.

In plain terms

If you complained about discrimination — formally or informally, in writing or out loud — that complaint is very likely a protected act.

There is one limit: an allegation made in bad faith — knowing it was false — is not protected. But an allegation that turns out to be wrong is still protected if you made it honestly.

What is victimisation?

Victimisation is being subjected to a detriment because you did a protected act. Two things have to connect: the detriment (some disadvantage done to you) and the reason for it (the protected act). You do not have to show the protected act was the only reason — it is enough that it had a significant influence on the employer's decision.

Victimisation is not about a protected characteristic. You can be victimised for complaining about discrimination even if you do not share the characteristic you complained about — for example, for supporting a colleague's complaint.

Proving the link

The hard part is usually the 'because'. The same shifting burden of proof applies: you show enough for a tribunal to conclude the detriment could have been because of the protected act, and the employer must then give an honest, non-victimisation reason. Timing, knowledge (did the decision-maker know about your complaint?), and any change in how you were treated after you complained all matter.

Where this comes from

  • Equality Act 2010, s.27victimisation; protected acts; the bad-faith exception
  • Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] ICR 877 (HL)the protected act need only have a significant influence, not be the sole reason
  • Equality Act 2010, s.136the shifting burden applies to victimisation too

Your next step

Read 'Detriments' next — the other half of a victimisation claim.

Related guides

Information, not advice. This guide explains the law in general terms and is not legal advice on your situation. Law can change and every case turns on its facts. For advice, see free help & links.